Newsbites: Time-restricted eating; back pain; improving diet quality
Time-Restricted Eating Did Not Benefit Weight or Health in Trial
In a relatively small randomized, crossover, controlled trial, time-restricted eating (also known as intermittent fasting) did not lead to improvements in weight or other selected health parameters compared to participants’ regular eating patterns. For four weeks, the 12 women and five men (average age of 26 years) with overweight or obesity ate whatever they wanted from 7:00 am to 3:00 pm and fasted the rest of the day. For another four weeks, they ate as they wanted.
The researchers measured body weight, waist and hip circumference, body composition, and blood pressure, and did blood tests to measure fasting blood glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, and insulin concentrations. They also asked the participants to rate their hunger.
Overall, the researchers found no significant changes in body weight or other parameters, however, when analyzed separately, the women did lose some weight (about two pounds) during the intervention.
Some studies have reported benefits of time-restricted eating on weight, blood sugar control, blood triglyceride levels, and appetite, but others (like this study) have not. There are a lot of variables to consider when conducting research like this (including age, weight, and health of participants, the length of the study, and the length and timing of the fasting period). Currently, it appears that time-restricted eating patterns are pretty much equivalent to traditional caloric restriction for weight and health. Some people may find the approach helpful, while others may not. As with most approaches to achieve your health goals, find something that’s right for you.
Recurrent Low Back Pain? Try Walking
A randomized controlled trial in Australia found an intervention that encouraged walking reduced the occurrence of low back pain compared to no intervention. The study enrolled 701 participants 18 and older (81 percent female, with an average age of 54 years) who were not already engaging in regular physical activity. In the previous six months, each participant had recovered from an episode of lowback pain that interfered with daily activities but did not have a specific, diagnosable cause (such as vertebral fracture or cancer).
The intervention group met with a physical therapist six times over a six-month period to develop a personalized progressive walking program and receive some education on pain science and low-back care. The goal was to be walking five times a week for at least 30 minutes a day by six months. Participants kept a walking diary and wore a pedometer, which measures step counts. At the three-month mark, they were asked to wear an accelerometer for seven days to measure daily step count, daily briskwalking steps, and minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity.
The intervention group reported less episodes of low back pain (including activitylimiting pain) compared with the control group. The control group also sought the help of massage therapists, physical therapists, and chiropractors more often than the walking group.
If you suffer from recurrent low-back pain, regular walking may be helpful and is beneficial for overall health. (Make sure your healthcare provider approves.) Start slowly and work your way up to walking on most days.
Join the Trend—Improve Your Diet Quality
A survey of 51,703 adults from 1999 to 2020 found that diet quality in the U.S. improved a bit, at least in people who don’t struggle to get enough to eat.
Participants were surveyed on their typical dietary intake. Their responses were compared to the American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 continuous diet score (which is based on higher intake of vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts/seeds, and fish and shellfish). Less than 40 percent adherence to the AHA score was considered poor diet quality, 40 to 79.9 percent was intermediate, and at least 80 percent adherence was ideal.
The proportion of U.S. adults with poor diet quality decreased from 48.9 percent in 1999 to 37.4 percent in 2020. The proportion with intermediate quality diets increased from 50.6 to 61.1 percent. The proportion of U.S. adults reporting eating an ideal diet more than doubled (from 0.66 percent to 1.58 percent) but is still extremely low. Diet quality did not improve for people experiencing food insecurity.
We are headed in the right direction but have a long way to go. You can choose low or minimally processed plant foods and fish/ shellfish in place of less healthy, more processed choices more often. Let’s keep those percentages improving!
The post Newsbites: Time-restricted eating; back pain; improving diet quality appeared first on University Health News.
Read Original Article: Newsbites: Time-restricted eating; back pain; improving diet quality »
