Improving the transparency and reliability of observational studies through registration

From the use of booster doses against covid-191 to approval of novel cancer therapies,2 health authorities and health technology assessment bodies are increasingly relying on non-randomised trials and observational studies. The methodological problems of observational studies, such as residual confounding,3 are difficult to resolve, but concerns about transparency and reliability can be reduced through registration.Registration is an open science practice whereby research hypotheses, elements of study design, and planned statistical analyses are prespecified, preferably in a centralised repository. Registration has become the norm for clinical trials (interventional studies),4 and some have called for it to be adopted for observational studies.56 However, opponents argue that systematic registration is unrealistic, unnecessary,78 and too complex.9 Some have even suggested that it may cause more harm than good as it could force researchers into scientific dishonesty9 and enable stakeholders with vested interests to use deviations from the initial protocol to discredit inconvenient findings.10However, unreliable…
Read Original Article: Improving the transparency and reliability of observational studies through registration »